From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug?] org-crypt warning and --daemon
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:18:11 +0100
Message-ID: <8762rim4nw.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <8739mpppxc.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <87mxkunlem.fsf@gnu.org>
	<sa3wrjyoxzl.fsf@cigue.easter-eggs.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36893 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0AHs-0006iO-8K
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:18:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Q0AHn-0005B0-2Q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:18:36 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f67.google.com ([74.125.82.67]:65026)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1Q0AHm-0005Ah-Rh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:18:30 -0400
Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so473328wwa.6
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 03:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <sa3wrjyoxzl.fsf@cigue.easter-eggs.fr> (Julien Danjou's message
	of "Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:14:06 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Memnon Anon <gegendosenfleisch@googlemail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 17 2011, Bastien wrote:
>
>> (Btw, I also wonder if it really makes sense to have auto-save-default
>> turned on in daemon mode.)
>
> I don't see why it would not?

Yes, you're right.

-- 
 Bastien