From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] show difference when recovering file Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:15:42 +0900 Message-ID: <876240xobl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <877goi0wcz.fsf@kanis.fr> <871uep9ch3.fsf@googlemail.com> <85sj74zk47.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355786470 7877 80.91.229.3 (17 Dec 2012 23:21:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ivan Kanis , Stefan Monnier , emacs devel To: Wolfgang Jenkner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 18 00:21:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkjzw-0002EP-Ho for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:21:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36500 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkjzj-0006tV-6R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:21:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51753) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkjzg-0006t3-K7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkjzf-00079L-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:32876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkjuZ-0005qF-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07C69708F9; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:15:42 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7448D1A2A0D; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:15:42 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <85sj74zk47.fsf@iznogoud.viz> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155633 Archived-At: Wolfgang Jenkner writes: > On Mon, Dec 17 2012, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > Rather than always popping up a *diff* buffer, we could also change the > > prompt from "yes/no" to "yes/no/diff". > > Instead of surprising the user with an additional choice, FWIW, no XEmacs user has complained about the additional choice in 10 years.