From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13152: 24.2.90; [REGRESSION] dired-get-marked-files changed Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:50:10 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <876235vp33.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87fw3bpqir.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <8738zasw5w.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87obhxbgdw.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <50CAFEBC.6000208@gmx.at> <50E67FE0.6030500@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357779122 4020 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2013 00:52:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13152@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 10 01:52:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6NW-0002cv-9u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:52:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6NG-0008MT-CH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6ND-0008MA-C0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:52:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6NB-00021U-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:51:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45999) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6NB-00021Q-NC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:51:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6NM-0001mX-Mn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:52:09 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:52:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13152 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13152-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13152.13577790776783 (code B ref 13152); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:52:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2013 00:51:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6MV-0001lL-V0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:51:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:34048 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt6MT-0001lA-FT for 13152@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:51:14 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EE229BC3516; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:50:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:07:57 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69552 Archived-At: > So I propose the following patch instead which avoids returning values > such as (nil) or (t nil). What do you think? Could you provide a test case that demonstrates the problem that you are trying to fix?