From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (unknown) Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:22:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8761wn1znp.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373124187 2068 80.91.229.3 (6 Jul 2013 15:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 15:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_T=E1vora?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 06 17:23:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUKJ-00026Y-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:23:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56160 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUKJ-0002ut-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUKD-0002uL-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUK9-0000V3-Qg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:57580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUK9-0000Ut-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:22:57 -0400 Original-Received: from 46.157.223.218.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.157.223.218] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UvUJy-0001jq-GH; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 17:22:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Thu, 4 Jul 2013 08:50:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1UvUJy-0001jq-GH MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1373728967.12622@O+0zHrnXJZjU1WJpoZKveQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161659 Archived-At: Jo=E3o T=E1vora writes: > To the question: Does it make sense to not use gnus-ancient-mark "O" > completely? I want to see old marks that I laboriously set in previous > sessions, such as the gnus-del-mark "r" mark. It seems to be replaced > by "O" all the time.=20 "r" just marks stuff as read, and this isn't saved beyond that. Any way of marking stuff as read ends up in the same data set, so it's all displayed as "O". --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/