From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15820: 24.3.50; (elisp) `File Local Variables' Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:56:16 +0100 Message-ID: <8761s5i9sv.fsf@web.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383767856 1570 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2013 19:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15820@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 06 20:57:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9E5-0006dj-Uy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:57:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35766 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9E5-0005xP-Ka for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9Dw-0005r6-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:57:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9Dq-0001lQ-UR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:57:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9Dq-0001l8-Qp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9Dq-0003Xb-Gp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15820 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 15820-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15820.138376778913573 (code B ref 15820); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15820) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2013 19:56:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37810 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9DJ-0003Wq-6w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:53970) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve9DG-0003Wa-Qw for 15820@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:56:27 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.77.170]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LkPW7-1WAisK3IM7-00cSdl for <15820@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:56:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:01:01 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ojhCtWIqdSbibiAuf2qFKGQG1mHJHXW6GidjW+/mTH8VZkNxwpA 6md703mHYpvqyEIFq+lzZhgbmpyUbnLq6Pt61CwzmRaKw3KAh5uCjXLcIl7/yKwigEpOPTn 8VNieRELrDcFglDqfokZh3JyY5ipNNI+V48YkmhMD68A77EHUzo1ZQki03tDBhj6UHR+Gsw G00QYSijg94KFcZNqf2BQ== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80093 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > It is explained in the immediately previous paragraph. > Repeating it seems unnecessarily verbose, and we all hate unnecessary > verbosity, don't we? Don't be so schnippisch! Regards, Michael.