From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why is `after-change-functions' reset? Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:57:45 +0100 Message-ID: <8761odfg1y.fsf@web.de> References: <878ut9r3ik.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392681483 12988 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2014 23:58:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 18 00:58:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY4g-0007DA-1h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:58:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45001 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY4f-0001XA-O3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:58:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY4X-0001VO-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:58:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY4R-0001PJ-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:58:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:60758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFY4R-0001P0-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.6.41]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Marpe-1WYsOz2kF0-00KLtb for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:57:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:49:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:KGSc+6YZknW/kK7DCFj+vBDmzRyfIPVLDL4k4uUNjXZD/6gbR4p Phj81/pU7TKvfkNNSjWR33a/8M/VCQX6oQmNQOg74SbDEvsjiAXaD51xep9MEOM4gz6+LP6 4617sIvkCR9JgEuIDQ4s9SSuvqk0Tjc21Oe7hJAomCmvnPakrp6Ff3nR1FTaZDIKwIcaxgC xrEJH5QQH2hGtBwnYbf1A== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169724 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > [ Please make it a bug report. ] Ok, will do. > > Evaluate it and hit tab (for completion) and C-g C-g in succession. > > When you repeat this a few times, you get "Why does this happen?". > > I couldn't reproduce it. It doesn't always happen, but after a few iterations, it'll happen sooner or later for me. > After the "Why does this happen?", if you do M-: (default-value > 'after-change-functions) RET what do you get? nil. Michael.