From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] eww-mode-map doesn't bind TAB on tty. Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:39:05 +0100 Message-ID: <8761nsqyly.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87zjlbtnuw.fsf@fx.delysid.org> <87fvmx7nym.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83ppm1ralm.fsf@gnu.org> <83ob1lracq.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2i0zund.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87lhwor8m9.fsf@fx.delysid.org> <87k3c8sexr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87fvmwseiu.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83eh2gqyp5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394044893 14027 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2014 18:41:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 05 19:41:42 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGl1-0006Fl-DX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:41:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53997 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGl0-000602-Rv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:41:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGks-0005yj-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:41:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGkn-0001aq-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:41:22 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:50695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGkn-0001ai-8H; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:41:17 -0500 Original-Received: from 77.18.54.110.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.54.110] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLGkW-0006K2-0P; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:41:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83eh2gqyp5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 05 Mar 2014 20:37:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WLGkW-0006K2-0P MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1394649660.31951@Q8vDKnp046o6G+6fpmeqPg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170164 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:10:01 +0100 >> >> (define-key map "\t" 'widget-forward) >> (define-key map "\e\t" 'widget-backward) >> (define-key map [(shift tab)] 'widget-backward) >> (put 'widget-backward :advertised-binding [(shift tab)]) >> (define-key map [backtab] 'widget-backward) >> >> Are there situations where just removing the latter binding is wrong? >> I.e., is there a difference between [?\M-\t] and [backtab] that should >> be preserved? > > If both are present, I don't think you should delete one of them. > E.g., some terminal might define an escape sequence to [backtab]. Hm. Should we always have two bindings each for [tab] and [backtab], then? This all seems kinda inconsistent. And should perhaps wait until after the feature freeze, anyway. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/