From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Clarification about auto-revert-mode and inotify Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:13:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8761fcqunl.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <87vbnd9aab.fsf@secretsauce.net> <878uk9s3mh.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83k33t9sqn.fsf@gnu.org> <877fzts0tj.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83h9yx9pvn.fsf@gnu.org> <8761fdryu4.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83egu19obu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413972858 27686 80.91.229.3 (22 Oct 2014 10:14:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dima Kogan , monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 22 12:14:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgsvi-0003yL-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:14:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56016 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgsvi-0004K7-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgsvL-0004Ez-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgsvH-0004T5-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:13:47 -0400 Original-Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([46.237.207.196]:55553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgsvD-0004Re-2l; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 06:13:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) id 1Xgsv9-0002Sp-4g; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:13:35 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgsv8-0007aN-TS; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:13:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83egu19obu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:09:57 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 46.237.207.196 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175688 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii: >> From: Dima Kogan >> Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:39:47 -0700 >> >> If I set the delay in the current code to 0.01 seconds, then isn't >> emacs polling its flag 100 times a second? > > Yes. But that's not acceptable anymore due to VMs and power management requirements.