From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Richard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:50:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87619oxf35.fsf@yahoo.fr> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <83pp7yp5po.fsf@gnu.org> <5511BB2A.2070909@dancol.org> <83oanip42b.fsf@gnu.org> <5511C10F.6040504@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427363420 31910 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2015 09:50:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sva-news@mygooglest.com, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 26 10:50:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yb4QT-0003fz-MG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:50:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43523 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yb4QO-000275-2a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 05:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yb4QK-00026p-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 05:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yb4QH-0000f8-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 05:50:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mxin.ulb.ac.be ([164.15.128.112]:4234) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yb4QH-0000bs-5a; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 05:49:57 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4FANvVE1WkD4Xx/2dsb2JhbABchDKCRK8wAQEBAQEBBpkSAoInAQEBAQEBfYQUAQEBBHkQCAMOBwMJJQ8BBEkTiBoBFLIQkhgBhhwBAQEBBgIBH4YNgjGCY4R2B4QtAQSaP4Z0jTgig289MYJDAQEB Original-Received: from mathsrv4.ulb.ac.be (HELO localhost) ([164.15.133.241]) by smtp.ulb.ac.be with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2015 10:49:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5511C10F.6040504@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:54:55 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 164.15.128.112 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184285 Archived-At: Daniel Colascione writes: > On 03/24/2015 12:51 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> From: Daniel Colascione >>> C-x v v should never push. That would be too surprising to user used to >>> working locally. >> >> Users whose workflow is not DWIM should never use "C-x v v". > > C-x v v doesn't push today, so current users don't mean "push". C-x v v could ask confirmation before pushing, and then offer to customize an option for not asking the confirmation again. -- Nicolas