From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Krehel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Should Emacs define push-tag-mark? Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 20:50:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87618gkrxx.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430247416 26191 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2015 18:56:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:56:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 28 20:56:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YnAgc-00069Q-3j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 20:56:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnAgb-0007i1-G1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:56:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnAgY-0007eN-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:56:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnAgV-0001gF-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:56:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]:36503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnAgV-0001g9-7P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:56:43 -0400 Original-Received: by wgen6 with SMTP id n6so4373198wge.3 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:56:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=w7TE7q2BJRALorIwf4ieepEYYWHhocD1GLlldQcXgK4=; b=F5GFlZVV+RjKGTlicUZklzVhZclzupJ16AqOn0IMHXEZdu1GJjJ9QzzMgaP9iOyk4Z v2fK5CHLSr/WfrLISzNWxLdtAHhKrqWcJJ1Cigu4xzB5sfklJnYYxl29JkVWDG8X6odV 03U7OLlY6XIqxbLtpiA2vBEzjHRIkRoIUV1FWMD/b2UQAXwHsms6EAsCEWu0f8AVCIS/ Kx06/+2o7QxnDVxx1UI5aH1Vf/IsNgNSUkQn8O4yJ8WWqBKgoO8lJQt1eJRl+KxUFiVV p14r33vjwb6e1xQpzG69afMIhbhvh20L84/Lbof/MHDd5c0C+yrVrXRBDDmK7J6eMEE5 55/g== X-Received: by 10.194.103.67 with SMTP id fu3mr35901463wjb.69.1430247402546; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from firefly (dyn069045.nbw.tue.nl. [131.155.69.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id um5sm21662136wjc.1.2015.04.28.11.56.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Apr 2015 11:56:42 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185982 Archived-At: I was just looking at why `pop-tag-mark' wasn't working after `semantic-ia-fast-jump'. Turns out it's because GNU/Emacs doesn't define `push-tag-mark' on which `semantic-ia-fast-jump' relies. Should I define this function? It would also fix #5666. Oleh