From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: export options and exporting subtrees
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 23:53:01 +0200
Message-ID: <876145zn7m.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87a8tj689p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54171)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZTdAh-00026x-Jw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:51:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZTdAg-0007qv-GQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:51:23 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:55055)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZTdAg-0007qm-9h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:51:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a8tj689p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of
	"Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:24:02 +0800")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> I'm not sure why I've never noticed this issue before, but...
>
> Is it intentional that, when exporting a subtree, EXPORT_OPTIONS lines
> at the top of the file (or EXPORT_OPTIONS properties on parent
> headlines) are ignored? I have `org-use-property-inheritance' set to t.
>
> I'm not wrong that that's what happens, am I? I found this a bit
> surprising, but I guess I could understand why it might happen. Is it
> intentional?

I don't see any reason to hard-code inheritance rules for "EXPORT_"
these properties. This is now fixed. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou