From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 9ce1d38: Use curved quotes in core elisp diagnostics Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 21:27:48 +1000 Message-ID: <876141as3v.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20150816160149.9416.80132@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <55D1043C.3030909@yandex.ru> <20150816225346.GA5367@acm.fritz.box> <55D2C080.2000806@cs.ucla.edu> <87wpwt5619.fsf@gnu.org> <55D36CB5.10803@cs.ucla.edu> <878u9879q9.fsf@igel.home> <19BD5D76-06A0-4FC0-A46F-760B2C27D321@gmail.com> <20150818194253.GE2262@acm.fritz.box> <0ac95dde-75ba-464b-90b2-1b19b348473e@default> <55DC530B.4040509@yandex.ru> <55DCE945.40701@yandex.ru> <41A4C5AF-6F4B-4927-8C42-E7E6048716E1@gmail.com> <877fohbf5g.fsf@gmail.com> <55DE96DE.80400@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440674886 27195 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2015 11:28:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:28:06 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 27 13:28:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUvLe-0007OG-HI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:28:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUvLd-0006Ub-QB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUvLa-0006UQ-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUvLX-0004gk-3n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]:34980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUvLW-0004gf-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: by pacdd16 with SMTP id dd16so22880285pac.2 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:27:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YopIyuZXe8uDVJrnpl7q6Zo8JiHZe/KN7hCY4IHquus=; b=vYunAr5WQF0Z3Ufln/vKDB4GihcqJSooJHMuiQA1fH123YYbATrqx1eNe5+1Ji9F4l sJ8jG3htHmtWAcGm7yv/65t8DQYkxDRrmqkh2Q6oO7rYgbMEEG448zuNxLZ0e0prmCUe cDygSk28PDr4100h6LeigRDLelLwITQ4ekSvqI7L1pRwWP1xjx5XNMWqNmixiWVMSoq0 PWhubK5WiQU/mJ4lmjgdGnexqeqCRDZDbqmwvTb/CIFIRGBn/BEo2TsGftCRxFTvmzUe p9Z1REPZrMpininxkAso2f68AgBw+tYtQX4jl+ENXJdHh8IjP8yfeZD4xnubdDN35TUS xg9Q== X-Received: by 10.69.12.33 with SMTP id en1mr5789802pbd.97.1440674874124; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (CPE-58-161-15-29.cqqy2.win.bigpond.net.au. [58.161.15.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm2141136pdc.71.2015.08.27.04.27.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:27:52 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <55DE96DE.80400@cs.ucla.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189223 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > English isn’t one of the two ASCII-only languages. It's naïve > to think that even American English is ASCII-only. Good point! My native language is Australian English, not American English, and i would consider it incorrect to write 'naive' instead of 'naïve'; to me, the former is simply a kludge imposed by the limitations of ASCII. Thanks to everyone who's commented on my question - it's been very educational. :-) Alexis.