From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: From Gnus to mu4e Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:08:47 +0200 Message-ID: <8761404q1s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d1yhpsbr.fsf@free.fr> <87lhczyl1p.fsf@free.fr> <87a8tezf7x.fsf@free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440695372 16455 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2015 17:09:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Julien Cubizolles Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 27 19:09:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV0fy-000127-9S for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:09:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43738 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV0fx-0008K6-PM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV0fi-0008JL-OG for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV0fd-0004Vf-17 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from so1.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.11]:39682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZV0fc-0004VT-Tp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:09:00 -0400 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJlYjQ5MyIsICJoZWxwLWdudS1lbWFjc0BnbnUub3JnIiwgIjI4ODhmOSJd Original-Received: from bzg.fr (fes75-4-78-192-157-63.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.157.63]) by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 55df4422.5ac0ed0-in7; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:08:50 -0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by bzg.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A37A339235D; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:08:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87a8tezf7x.fsf@free.fr> (Julien Cubizolles's message of "Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:22:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 198.61.254.11 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:106869 Archived-At: Julien Cubizolles writes: > + regarding filtering and spam detection, do you rely on the > possibilities offered by you mail provider (Gmail or other)? For providers that do spam filtering, obviously yes. For others, I first fetch emails on a server using fetchmail/spamassassin, then expose these emails using dovecot on the server. > > + you said you're running Dovecot. Gnus could also directly access the > local maildir without a local imap server the way mu4e does, couldn't > it=C2=A0? What's the benefit of running it=C2=A0? Sorry I wasn't clear. I have 1. an address from my internet provider 2. an address from my own remote server multiple addresses are collected on 2 (using fetchmail/spamassassin) and dovecot is running on this remote server. I use maildir for both 1 and 2 on my local machine, sync'ing all mails with mbsync. >> - postfix with smtp_sender_dependent_authentication to use various >> smtp servers depending on the email I'm using. I see people use >> msmtp and msmtp-mta, which I tried for a while, but I'm just too >> impatient with the .3s you have to wait when sending.=20=20 > > From looking at my fossilized .gnus.el, I'm using smtpmail, which > would be equivalent to msmtp. > > + I'm gonna need to duplicate this setup on two machines (laptop and > desktop). I guess running offline imap on the two machines and > synchronizing the nnml, nnarchive mail by unison would work. I guess so, yes. > Thanks a lot for all this information. I've a much clearer idea of all > the possibilities now. You're welcome! PS: I secretly love anything related to emails, this is fascinating. --=20 Bastien