From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add shell-quasiquote. Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:25:39 +0200 Message-ID: <876125uqzw.fsf@T420.taylan> References: <87si59wj42.fsf@T420.taylan> <83eggt4esi.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv19wh7b.fsf@T420.taylan> <83bnbx4d7e.fsf@gnu.org> <87twppuzfu.fsf@T420.taylan> <83a8rh48if.fsf@gnu.org> <87io65utmt.fsf@T420.taylan> <5622B337.4050700@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445117158 6245 80.91.229.3 (17 Oct 2015 21:25:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 17 23:25:57 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYzE-0000NU-Ag for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:25:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59809 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYzD-0005wg-Aw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYz1-0005wZ-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYz0-000270-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]:38441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnYyz-00026w-Sv; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 17:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so52864017wic.1; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:25:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iQxtlvHUM8r80Nm9o0kaBoVzMfA96wrG4pW1larq3Vk=; b=pROy/OJmczyEmkvZjJDv2mJFOX4bZJgEYaNAiocvPhMUT5RSMZizk9P1FqLG+djvJX Ah4OsA13MfTwMoO1xf1VFlo6HNuRLTVKE23MvdkH4S0JbBcpC9zlYGzFv0ljvLAVNG+8 SRiYWHz6OmKVzSIYv8vYVp5UNeReIbMC/6ps1yLfr25dkOkoBsb/y0g3/pGXycQAXq54 gA4aQGheDPvuD2Ticxv1WypO3jHQTHzDXexPYF2ep+BHqmxPVHn1aYI/gCDpESwu8sVG SRDaTQmSR/pRo6hQHXJWt9Wm17EsO4H9CB9jgK1IlVh6lOF/hF0CFw73EDhna2+hwZMa 3oCg== X-Received: by 10.180.77.106 with SMTP id r10mr12530643wiw.84.1445117141324; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from T420.taylan ([2a02:908:c32:4740:221:ccff:fe66:68f0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jt3sm30397240wjc.12.2015.10.17.14.25.40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:25:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5622B337.4050700@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:44:39 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191886 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 10/17/2015 11:28 PM, Taylan Ulrich Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer wrote: > >> I have taken a look. It doesn't use the same strategy even for POSIX >> shells, and I can't be as sure of its safety as I am of the safety of my >> implementation. When it comes to non-POSIX shells, I have no clue. > > If you know of a real problem scenario reproducible with > shell-quote-argument, please file a bug. Then we'll fix it. Not knowing that there are bugs is not proof that there are no bugs. > Either way, please avoid reinventing the wheel. It's not a reinvention because it has very strict semantics with regard to safety guarantees, which shell-quote-argument apparently doesn't. Taylan