Re: unidentical erc-nick-default-face and erc-my-nick-face identical

Re: unidentical erc-nick-default-face and erc-my-nick-face identical

[Michael Olson]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 910 bytes --]

+emacs-devel for discussion

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se>
wrote:

> Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
>
> >> When I check the face of the <nicks> to the left,
> >> they are either (erc-nick-default-face
> >> erc-nick-default-face) if it isn't me, or, if it
> >> is, (erc-nick-default-face erc-my-nick-face)
> >
> > OK, there is a stack with a specific-to-general
> > priority. I have the priority backwards for my nick.
> > To have the same face stacked twice is still odd,
> > tho it can't hurt :) Perhaps I configured this
> > somehow. I will test with -q. BRB.
>
> No, just tested with -q, same thing (both
> cases). Strange.
>
> --
> underground experts united
> http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Erc-discuss mailing list
> Erc-discuss@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/erc-discuss
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1678 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 144 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Erc-discuss mailing list
Erc-discuss@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/erc-discuss

Re: unidentical erc-nick-default-face and erc-my-nick-face identical

[Emanuel Berg]

OK, as there hasn't been any discussion neither on
gmane.emacs.erc.general nor gmane.emacs.devel I do as
you did and include gmane.emacs.help as well.

The situation is described in this quote:

> Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org> writes:
>
> +emacs-devel for discussion
>
>> Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
>>
>>>> When I check the face of the <nicks> to the left,
>>>> they are either (erc-nick-default-face
>>>> erc-nick-default-face) if it isn't me, or, if it
>>>> is, (erc-nick-default-face erc-my-nick-face)
>>>
>>> OK, there is a stack with a specific-to-general
>>> priority. I have the priority backwards for my
>>> nick. To have the same face stacked twice is still
>>> odd, tho it can't hurt :) Perhaps I configured
>>> this somehow. I will test with -q. BRB.
>>
>> No, just tested with -q, same thing (both
>> cases). Strange.

-- 
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573