From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: 64 bit official Windows builds Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:16:35 +0100 Message-ID: <8760xuuc3g.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <2577057e-98d3-41ce-ade2-1496648b09c3@googlegroups.com> <8337t3qdpd.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpqb7yzk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455229033 21847 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2016 22:17:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:17:13 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 23:17:06 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aTzXt-0006wt-Lj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:17:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54106 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTzXs-0001tW-LA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:17:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTzXe-0001rs-SR for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:16:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTzXa-000177-T9 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:16:50 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTzXa-00016x-Lu for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:16:46 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aTzXZ-0006f4-II for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:16:45 +0100 Original-Received: from 1.red-83-38-42.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.38.42.1]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:16:45 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 1.red-83-38-42.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:16:45 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1.red-83-38-42.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uBMdQMp0JiZ0ZnDHIjYsWxRIpbU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:109122 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Do you see such a factor-of-2 difference when doing "rm lisp/**/*.elc; >> make"? Or in which kind of circumstance have you seen such a slowdown? > > I measured that by running GNU Find compiled from the same sources on > a large and deep directory tree on the same Windows 7 box. > > That thunking is the culprit is my theory, not a fact; however, I > cannot find any other explanation. If someone does, I'm all ears. I mentioned some possibilities on a previous message. Did you use the same toolset and libraries for the 32 and 64 bits build? The MinGW and MinGW-w64 (32/64 bits) runtimes diverged quite a bit.