From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing bugs from the blockers Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:20:26 +0200 Message-ID: <8760uhlng5.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20160509235343.17047.73943@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160509235343.759D0220128@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <831t569wwu.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg96l06p.fsf@gnus.org> <83lh3e82sw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463420440 25280 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2016 17:40:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 17:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 16 19:40:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MV0-0006Pt-M4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 19:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45422 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MV0-0007pb-3h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MUg-0007gT-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MUc-0002WC-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2MUc-0002VY-3Z; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.143.127.196] (helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b1JZT-0004PH-5v; Fri, 13 May 2016 22:20:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83lh3e82sw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 13 May 2016 17:12:31 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203858 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I didn't set the indication, so I don't feel myself authorized to > remove it unilaterally. Everybody involved in Emacs can set the blockiness, so everybody involved in Emacs should feel enabled to remove blockiness, I think. It's all (mostly) just a matter of taste and opinion, after all. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no