From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:21:13 +0200 Message-ID: <8760sjn5me.fsf@web.de> References: <8760stvwzp.fsf@web.de> <834m8cvu9p.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9cbpw61.fsf@web.de> <83wpl7v1sg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8i2dfe3.fsf@web.de> <83poqyvh58.fsf@gnu.org> <87shvu1ixp.fsf@web.de> <8360spvn6i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467753730 14796 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2016 21:22:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: me@wilfred.me.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 23:22:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bKXn6-00035t-LB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:22:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKXn5-0005CB-RQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:21:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKXmV-0005C5-Un for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:21:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKXmV-0004fO-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:21:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:52962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bKXmR-0004dp-0N; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.67.73.210]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBCYn-1bAskJ2tM5-00ACM2; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:21:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8360spvn6i.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 01 Jul 2016 10:21:09 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:unoWsmxr0Z80R94oU3Pj4zrxTAs6u8kQr59mkAHdvwtNtu5Ocw/ WJBrBtO+1hZBR3K29k9KcmbIsyg8bCMXZ4K7Z9F6JGY1HXSStF1ap7TFpXANjclGdy3y/ov 02lLulBY4tS8ndhnhJrHiUq4+i8mg4EI7cSIgDBNyB/3v93uTw1K5sWqEjHNYcXZfHnXVdG PLAjweIeRi/Tj98a6tI+A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:5Y+kuGzoC4Q=:JSwMH8ZSx3IBGzPPU2JTNr Avhe3cnBgIRAmsyxrFc5BAHtXXvmtPBkPD4oyQalXy8btD9bblhAq+vgv1SsS3BoL920unS4C sZWsmymNDJbxooKV34e+TE8HDd4TG9e3MTK4FKxprUheHqbkajezNy1AMS0Al/F35+5hDADM8 rIa+MFeAePvnA6HTTdLP/7j9KEZY4lsOihrs+65+pr6LTxtNHRygrzQrztx0cTjsjMmHMbadO Xf2M78NNUmmYGF1HVPj4eadWChu9NQiSrhSeNt4FyGH6px/WEwZKa6ufq0c+YCWWUghR2JX7E ifejZF8g2jURkJ80vAq9+tcHb7hqyITpiRrbc2iCBa3/ivqLsZ7ZdFZFghKAfC93Bmj4aJO4r xav1RslFd0DFh04K477go0zU7+T1y7arxmH/gFGGajLOrW+b/FaTV5/VjwISM8+lTKyYuGV/3 7H2sXx3r83aG3ffF3cM99PVHeZ1GhTcE5ke0a076QrNQfTRcBqyint/Jbfh+aQAU0mkPgbzXt OnjqnZrS4tTSv6Z4psTA7tI1Ek58d/XC4my+aL6xBwx+vCZgS1m2yj4HIp0SAEH1RFmACIJmi j/iErq4TDjNMmQ2cJamZmOG1SGx2J0ZmB6KiioQ7rNhK68IBB2TeyitHMc9ElX1dXNOqR5+Yp 5gm/1N+QLxFvnXzH5dTwFKPMLASA43Ar1NOGNkWj+HuFPpMjRdKUylylTAfe7z+Fcu+smaNLP Wd7TeRI9EkSubpR9FIvETW2kuH23cOYBqD6FsElSK7wQ/GMtxLsP1Xpzs179vv7FjWdLMbsJ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205209 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > I can give it a quick try (I'm on vacation). The first thing that I found out: it makes a difference whether I use the compiled simple.elc or the source simple.el. Only with the compiled simple.elc I get the unexpected result of 20. But when I load the uncompiled simple.el into the batch session, I'm not able to reproduce the issue (I get 10). Does that give us hints about how I could proceed? Thanks, Michael.