From: Andreas Politz <politza@hochschule-trier.de>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
Cc: 26126@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 16:56:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8760j2mxmt.fsf@luca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871strm323.fsf@detlef> (Michael Albinus's message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2017 09:44:52 +0100")
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> writes:
> Andreas Politz <politza@hochschule-trier.de> writes:
>
>>>> Sure, the back-ends mostly watch directories, except for kqueue. But is
>>>> this behavior also intended to be propagated to the clients of
>>>> filenotify.el ?
> We've discussed this a while ago, main reason (IIRC) was to achieve
> same behaviour for the different libraries.
>
> I cannot find the discussion just now, likely it was in one of the
> bugs. The main reason was the w32notify library, which works only
> watching directories.
>
> Later on we've added the kqueue library, which works reliably only
> watching files. This breaks the unification attempt, but I don't believe
> we shall change the behaviour again.
Ok, I try to find it, but note that this behavior was introduced with
the following (kqueue-only) commit
commit 7bf54d01159eb09bae3c9cd86f2af0812d9afdf6
Author: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
Date: Fri Jan 22 19:56:09 2016 +0100
Backport kqueue integration from master
Maybe we can work on unifying the behavior across back-ends at a later
time, while taking some pointers from other projects, e.g.
https://github.com/emcrisostomo/fswatch .
If it stays this way, it should probably be documented.
-ap
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-21 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 14:14 bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches Andreas Politz
2017-03-17 14:41 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-17 14:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-17 16:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-17 17:45 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 8:30 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 13:32 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 20:37 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-19 9:39 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-19 11:14 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-19 19:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-20 20:39 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 8:44 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-21 18:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 13:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 15:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 16:01 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 16:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-24 19:54 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 12:50 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 13:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:27 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 16:37 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 17:12 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 19:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-26 7:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:56 ` Andreas Politz [this message]
2017-03-22 12:56 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 17:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 18:49 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-19 22:05 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 13:05 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:06 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 15:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 13:17 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 17:43 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 18:57 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 20:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-23 7:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-23 15:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-23 16:10 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 19:40 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-24 20:44 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 6:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-25 8:57 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-25 16:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:04 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:19 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 17:09 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 17:26 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:18 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:40 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:21 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:28 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:49 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 20:48 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-30 18:15 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8760j2mxmt.fsf@luca \
--to=politza@hochschule-trier.de \
--cc=26126@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.