Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>  . The order of the references to various parts of the changes in the
>    log message should assume the reading order of top to bottom, so
>    the log message might need some minor reordering.  In this case,
>    your original order:

I was going for a mostly alphabetical ordering. I take it that doesn't
matter?

>> * doc/emacs/display.texi (Standard Faces):
>> * etc/NEWS: Document the face.
>> * lisp/emacs-lisp/tabulated-list.el (tabulated-list-init-header):
>> * lisp/info.el (Info-fontify-node): Use the face.
>> * lisp/faces.el: Define the face.
>
>    refers to "the face" before it was defined.  I've reordered it to
>    put the reference to the lisp/faces.el change before all the rest.

I don't really understand this part (though I don't mind following it).
Only the commit summary line references the face by name, and the
summary is already at the top. Why does it matter that, in the actual
program execution, the face has to be defined first?

P.S. I happened upon two more places to add this face to. Would you
please push this as well?

Thanks.