From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Flymake refactored Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:53:43 +0200 Message-ID: <8760bz9rl4.fsf@jane> References: <87h8vmj3tr.fsf@lolita> <87poa8aadq.fsf@jane> <87poa74usq.fsf@lolita> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506848049 22094 195.159.176.226 (1 Oct 2017 08:54:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 08:54:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, sdl.web@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 01 10:54:03 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dya0g-00055Q-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:54:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dya0o-00038h-3V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 04:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39673) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dya0h-00038M-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 04:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dya0e-0004Kb-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 04:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:49497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dya0e-0004JT-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 04:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A09E64E9; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:53:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KjZdLebdeFGv; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:53:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (static-dwadziewiec-jedenpiec7.echostar.pl [109.232.29.157]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14237E64CA; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:53:54 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <87poa74usq.fsf@lolita> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218982 Archived-At: On 2017-10-01, at 01:43, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora wro= te: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> I didn't (yet) look at it, but thanks for working on this. I use >> Flycheck currently (maily for JavaScript/ESlint), but I'm wondering >> whether to switch to flymake at some point in time. Just being curiou= s: >> does Flycheck support running more linters on the same file at the sam= e > > I don't know (did you mean Flycheck or Flymake?). If you meant Flymake, > then the answer is yes. I know that. I want to know whether Flycheck can do that, too. If not, then we have a strong advantage of Flymake. >> time? (From a cursory glance at the docs, I'm not sure.) Also, how >> would one switch to Flymake for JS? > > One possibility would be: wait that it is (hopefully) present in the > next official emacs release, Emacs 26.1 and then wait that someone > writes a decent JS backend (what you call "linter" and Flycheck calls > "checkers") for it. By "linter" I mean the outside program doing the checking (like ESlint). By "checker", Flymake/Flycheck mean the Elisp interface between the linter and fly.*. > Another possibility would be: check out the most recent code and write > the backend yourself :-) That's a cool idea. I am quite tempted to do that. As usual, time is the main problem. >> (Note: I understand that your time is limited, Jo=C3=A3o, so if answer= to any >> of these questions requires more than 30 seconds, just tell me to rtfm= , >> which I'll be happy to do once I'm at home.) > > :-) > > It took about 60 seconds but I'm not going to charge for the extra 30. Oh, thanks! > Also there is yet no m to rtf. Working on it. I'd be happy to proofread it when the time comes. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski