From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnus work Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 10:14:21 -0700 Message-ID: <8760bta55e.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87vajudasc.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k20apstn.fsf@gnuvola.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507223836 2354 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2017 17:17:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:17:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 19:17:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e09lg-0007uE-SL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:17:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e09lo-0002eQ-0T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:17:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e09kl-0002cm-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e09kf-0004dM-QD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=37064 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e09kf-0004bN-KC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e09kU-0000cm-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 19:15:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:l5o0NfH67pto/cUZyzlzrPgmto8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219130 Archived-At: Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () Eric Abrahamsen > () Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:32:03 -0700 > > 3. Look at unpicking functions so that there's a clearer > demarcation between code that does server logic (marks and > whatnot) and code that does UX/presentation stuff. > > What do you mean by "unpicking functions"? Should that be read > as ADJ N (functions that have the "unpicking" quality) or V N > (the action of "unpicking" applied to functions), or something > else entirely? I dig the zen feel of the sentence, anyway. :-D Only when we realize the illusory nature of functions can we make Gnus go faster? :)