From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 d2d5e54: Mention remote file name completion in Emacs manual Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 14:08:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87607br3d9.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20180203203124.9577.74338@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180203203125.63A2520690@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lgg9xhwl.fsf@gmx.de> <83bmh4ad1y.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9l4mx98.fsf@gmx.de> <878tc8jtoa.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517835995 29785 195.159.176.226 (5 Feb 2018 13:06:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:06:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 05 14:06:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eigTQ-0006aj-DS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 14:06:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41470 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eigVR-0005Xg-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:08:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eigVF-0005Vn-75 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eigVC-0001Po-1k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:52788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eigVB-0001Mt-Mz; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 08:08:05 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.38.251]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mg3Vt-1eNyBa1nlt-00NVd3; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 14:08:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:22:57 -0800") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gjQGSJl1rJkx6eCWQJ5d/pEx2SFj5F9GZoEFxSugbfF1Pl5EjSv 8F0A68rZ9KBGNJZumMTWoYnkBcvjgnvxsq8GvHJqlGAFuHag3oNcLYFGrbw68YVHgvcfoMw lI+uR48gsNqd9/5pr3q1iHIfJLlA8r3M5Af+23NtpqwvoDDKs16tBEmEKpt1vAzquqMMYAM uBOY2gJxWshv0P8SywM+A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fSAdESrg4ck=:L9t4z4Tx6vQp8y7qrrxM39 JFa+XL0GLswc8v1QVZTeyNtxQASG5n/1u0KN85XJ8ROzeq2Cp3X5IrDLUhfHuj7uwe5+akMvv pwTnT+c18FqnEB97GAH41pwYXR9NarygwwQNqHA8LNN4azyAPSeNDIkdVA9yhLqcuWvMk14bi RUh+lsNBVdB1YrTvq3NDc2Bkp0MUh1tcgA58m2PUyXLjFwlWQlErOpJlX4SgkcwBsJC9SUUYc ULX9U4FXWwDvJ6Cyhz/jLCVnY0vrNmlwVCQy6e1I6+h23qkF78EcsZS81QsNTIwMI2GX0FkYP yzi9mYxZhPl5fLZpmPVVhA5uUGvDtrxBjEwV4KqLGuajvpyX5k/zGhHWfK/mHy77SDCagm2Gj VCmAUkKr7Hc6qSZ4KLKrcdM4lKsukGHu2cu0ax5bBfNI1llbZrWekdcX/TiWSs9tAmzUO5vLd uQGEJv1H4so9dMwVWhq4/kGXtnLZyBht0UzJhsqp71VK2GhfI0tF8/ewfl+7M3JuUALgISA2c iCbPI2KZVvWgvn0quNjJGAeyy2J33mg3xqyZjbwuUBmsH2ZJ6IH73U8395psR+kuLgM10PMKI a/2TLNXFNSHrZlI2oeMXr+ndL1Gb11C0HT3RPE28/ubKe3HhDOSFilyCHdBQw0YP5OjRE3e6B kPlLds3VIxaZAYYrC4jB2uFCBc4oitHsU0mMMsv73FbvZ2b/Br+qJjUbEBxT0fEseZNR29Cr9 /VrcKZsBlk7DeuoZicWsWqg85NsIqBTdRc46mkc8Qavs/A36UEwuPLK16nAY9dVb46N3Wx5j X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222551 Archived-At: "John Wiegley" writes: > MA> Yes. Vanilla Emacs ("emacs -Q") behaves like this: > > MA> /ssh:ford:/ completes in / on remote > MA> /ssh:ford:// completes in / on local > MA> /ssh:ford:/// completes in / on remote > > MA> The second one is the inconsistency I wrote about (it shall complete in / > MA> on remote). The third one I didn't recognize until now, it shall complete > MA> in / on local. A bug. > > MA> My proposal is the behavior you've shown with ivy, also for vanilla Emacs. > > OK, I change my objection and agree with you. I'd like to see this fixed. Done, pushed to master. Best regards, Michael.