From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joshua Branson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current State of CEDET in Emacs tree and standalone Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:48:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87601b9t8f.fsf@fastmail.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532011113 13282 195.159.176.226 (19 Jul 2018 14:38:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:38:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 19 16:38:29 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fgA4a-0003JS-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:38:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43610 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgA6g-0003Jp-5A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:40:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41859) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgA6U-0003J2-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:40:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgA6O-0006BN-C1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:53073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fgA6N-000692-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567D721ECD for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:40:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:40:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=TQcm4wP5j37hMZv/QLFBW7QWLPZ7FrdAqL/OIHi7itY=; b=CHaWH7JN pVArtvFZC+pwVazrQhWSN+KT0sK1i8K30bPNtU79+QEueI/nq6gUilH7W9VQjI5T hxZ7hg1iubQsnIKq3VGRUH86ZX8vJqtRtLykkTGYxf3mp90TC+b3fmJDLZ11/KIO /M5tJqOkA3s3104zq63geeXaj6ThokPXM8ORPF7BNCd8OLDO1UIloSpvLxOjMwmP LGRk1qS6aui+itzOKQoa3xdei7r831uoxBoBfQAQaJTa93U8z0VtJMKCn8uA6NB4 ndcwMNz8HPIjaOCX86w5sxLcew1wM+E/IBj2IhU7DD6PoRLPCoG8msc6x9cX9eFs Sk57t8HT7DMTwA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=TQcm4wP5j37hMZv/QLFBW7QWLPZ7F rdAqL/OIHi7itY=; b=dTMJXsozIVKRWvi4eXj8hPOXtWWb4mNbJ0h15rD31IfwE DlNlInCvmmCxPAI2L9i1VIJLNGpJC13IeGLeAYXISeFuliey7pTEqtxw7uuPSxql gWAcdqabcR8eWFrYxtkxKKUR0Oycxc9bKv/AJeu6Kts6qtSmbZ7/jHqiQcnortzN aqaIaX1KbklQTOL5hTHgxiAW4GZ4Ak+OjaK84jw+47syYS8phjjV/0YbMUNlD5Kh Q8ZSPSgoc8jkKTzuIx544WgTxHTYoXAz84x2y5Lf1QJ7uCBNCVBNI1vrh71F2aKy dO7dUMmtmbFkE3tOM/KeXpJvjy7CJTAp1hD09wLlA== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Original-Received: from dobby (unknown [72.12.220.132]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C5907E450F for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:40:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Marschke's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:09:12 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.25 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227560 Archived-At: Andreas Marschke writes: > Hi all! > > In a quest to add some improvements to CEDET/Semantic I came across the fact of the splintered codebases people are potentially working on. > > We have the CEDET project on SourceForge with changes going beyond the initial import into emacs. > And then there is the version shipped with Emacs. > > When comparing the code basis one of the most immediate things that struck me, was the availability of tests and that there was even rudimentary unit testing employed, This is not the case > for the code in Emacs tree. > > Are there efforts to import the code from Sourceforge anew into the emacs tree or is it intended to remain there as it pertains to features not intended to be shipped with Emacs? > Not to be a debbie downer, but is CEDIT worthwhile to continue? (admittedly I really don't know much about CEDIT). I'm under the impression that semantic may not be needed, since microsoft is pushing the LSP (language server protocal). Just curious, Joshua