From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Baxter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34639: 26.1; Custom themes break terminal when switching to org-mode Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 06:27:19 +0000 Message-ID: <875zt7m5dk.fsf@yandex.com> References: <877edpnks4.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83lg25nizp.fsf@gnu.org> <874l8t10t3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83a7ilngql.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3x0zfz.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <835zt9ng24.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvgtget3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834l8tnf4b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o971hskf.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8336odnen2.fsf@gnu.org> <87va19dkaw.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <831s3wo87r.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3vofu9.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87imx71vuc.fsf@tcd.ie> <83h8crmdan.fsf@gnu.org> <4780FCD2-DC65-412B-AC86-11F9FF2C4396@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="107303"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: , rms@gnu.org, 34639@debbugs.gnu.org, contovob@tcd.ie, kisik21@fireburn.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 07:29:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWFV-000Rq0-Ff for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:29:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50215 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWFU-0001q4-BP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 01:29:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWDj-0000ai-MR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 01:28:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWDi-0002DQ-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 01:28:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWDh-0002Cj-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 01:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWDh-0006UT-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 01:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Colin Baxter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 06:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34639.155116245424917 (code B ref 34639); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 06:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2019 06:27:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52214 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWDF-0006To-Km for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 01:27:33 -0500 Original-Received: from forward106o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.187]:60411) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyWDB-0006TY-Bk for 34639@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 01:27:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mxback18j.mail.yandex.net (mxback18j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::94]) by forward106o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7C56D506002B; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:27:22 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from smtp4p.mail.yandex.net (smtp4p.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1402::15:6]) by mxback18j.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id KeV5PQ3bJd-RLsuAFCg; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:27:22 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1551162442; bh=wgl0IOW7Hn2iZIWv8Wp7KekmdZag7d5GFzmb31/G2XA=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Cc:Cc:Date:References:Message-ID; b=mIsODJZw/G7hkNGUiprjA+Je5Zg4xB3BRbRkj9hLbCMNCczMc87xh77kvm373qGLa BXW71D4eN2YjUMcMWn/ppyl6X6lVSluIB+Bsa7iFVitTfAcNs4HMU/NFxnkIKtxQcI UIDLR+pxo6g3ZrHPFiYnZfievKJUH29j1fJibdVk= Authentication-Results: mxback18j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Original-Received: by smtp4p.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id BWzPQnaJeD-RKDuN2AP; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:27:20 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Face: -P+89ASh_wrs;AUGm`!l[}/o-lyK}5W.gq\fkJ{#d6Gu,hWrZNz::iMm5PJb} __A96]-LUrl)X=uF=V|\3-\9/sXvBs/H In-Reply-To: <4780FCD2-DC65-412B-AC86-11F9FF2C4396@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:38:47 +0200") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACwAAAAMCAIAAACWSshgAAAABmJLR0QA/wD/AP+gvaeTAAAA sklEQVQ4je1TwY0CQQyzM9kVohQK4EURVwd1Xg2UgpAgMR++55F2JV7nt+NYjsOf6xkU/sbtV4+7 I3gcjjxd6BhiZgaHI3G8rMYEHFzWdB5KmWtwhCFFKMb2JCKY67Am2q3/GrJLRBuG1NL2JCR2Wf1S dmtycu3xAEhdbl6tFEBMl+xxQT8uIJdlUkwGIrabYDAn3/FfzA+hlNUKf7Pe1Uw1vIluZFervMye VgJSPW0SwBtzLmwBGfcsdwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155798 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > On February 26, 2019 6:55:32 AM GMT+02:00, Glenn Morris wrote: >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > I left linum-mode not obsolete because some people might decide >> not to > switch due to those differences. We should revisit this >> issue a few > years from now, IMO. >> >> We already agreed to obsolete linum (which has two replacements) >> years ago; https://debbugs.gnu.org/27622#37 > It's not in obsolete, is it? May I put in a selfish plea to delay obsoleting 'linum-mode'. I use it all the time. It's customised to my liking and I much prefer it to 'display-line-numbers-mode'. Perhaps, if I use 'linum-mode' extensively then there may well be (many?) others who do likewise. Best wishes, -- Colin Baxter m43cap@yandex.com