From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Tomas Hlavaty <tom@logand.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: named-let
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:27:38 +0100
Message-ID: <875z4385yd.fsf@logand.com>
References: <jwvpn2egaj3.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <87im86kub6.fsf@logand.com> <86zh1g62zx.fsf@163.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="24605"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 23:30:50 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kz5i5-0006Is-Vs
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:30:49 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45422 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kz5i4-00078d-Rw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:30:48 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36784)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <tom@logand.com>) id 1kz5f6-0005eO-5w
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:27:44 -0500
Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:46600)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <tom@logand.com>) id 1kz5f4-0008Cm-FR
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:27:43 -0500
Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 44E0D19F103; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:27:41 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer: emacs 27.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I)
In-Reply-To: <86zh1g62zx.fsf@163.com>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com;
 helo=logand.com
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262941
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/262941>

On Mon 11 Jan 2021 at 02:49, Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com> wrote:
> I think the advice mechanism prevent us to do optimization like TCO and
> auto inlining.

TCO for cl-labels is great already.

As for inlining, is there a way to specify that a function should be
inline/notinline?