From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46151: 28.0.50; Set revert-buffer-function in shell command output buffers Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 17:08:31 -0700 Message-ID: <875z3ctzsw.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <87lfcdd1he.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87im7gward.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnvwte7y.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87a6ssus1o.fsf@gnus.org> <17531095-f533-1f00-e330-2d171e33a258@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15479"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46151@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 01 01:08:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6MlH-0003qn-BZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 01:08:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6MlF-0000Du-I7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6Ml8-0000Dm-JU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6Ml8-0004ju-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6Ml8-0004Dy-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sean Whitton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46151 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 46151-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46151.161213807416224 (code B ref 46151); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46151) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 00:07:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58353 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6Ml0-0004Db-GJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:35219) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6Mky-0004DM-Gu for 46151@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:07:53 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886A4961; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:07:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 31 Jan 2021 19:07:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=5/OHrRYp3vDafIU4NkUCHD1xi8 CnfrnoGam8ejMLdAo=; b=lzgHdb1qrkmT4eQwSAwTf6F3etPHrQDNlg+rrvX2q2 tJ+bLycOSIt+g1AqFUbLca42SH+wAPbTa2CtF66+IvpX5ltljycR1HQA91BtbQfM zOaCkBG8t56DPa0byXW2U31VEeJCkvChsgCVtzDhkEj0ggVKJiCvc7RJWMZ/to5V +j1dV5FqpufNiwXAsTzDsXSQd/bBYyVaFxJkhluXwDtvKUfH9WoJMDkALHXRRmXI VxO1dZ41ZnK2IEtW4jcsQ8AeCnYcxGXushdKGF22Kg0SLF3J4gwh29k7Nx1X1ZmD u2Dr46eVQE4A1CFXTjWMf+5A5TgaLJDObfGQigqKx/Rg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=5/OHrR Yp3vDafIU4NkUCHD1xi8CnfrnoGam8ejMLdAo=; b=lbffEn551x8e2tp5nH5C2o JQIQZJ/fWbP1tWGR8rhC+OM601QNiGUzDYIvQV32MOOx35bi2zy6qU0JOj6yahlv D9b2Em3c4DJ/0FZMFaF9HJtmVgZFmXV66q/T98cCxT+YVOwJl+O3fOUUGZoSiWUk WWlh0/zToIkfOmwzlHvouQ85QzU3NFLJht8QUyCby5jK8+0k7QqCa3OvaDfou0+i zGL8n0OvvDmIH2b6erP9j/puF+oFME4NEXzEoXlvNnEOCf60s+MdCUabAG5kH1r3 Ix5uIXLwLpDrbFh7PVhVYAsIz3Mys7YKwsrqJ/ydA+sEikqJP55WcG0wL8aU1hYw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeejgdduiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertddttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcuhghh ihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgedtvdehgeffhfffvdeffefhgfejffelhfetveffffektefgtdej tdeivddtveehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: In-Reply-To: <17531095-f533-1f00-e330-2d171e33a258@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199043 Archived-At: Hello, On Mon 01 Feb 2021 at 01:31AM +02, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 29.01.2021 09:21, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >>> I take it a minor mode is more appropriate than a major mode for this? >>> If so, I can come up with a patch adding that to simple.el. >> Since M-! and M-& use different modes (fundamental and shell), a minor >> mode is probably the best, I guess. > > Maybe have them use the same mode? The purpose of those buffers seems > the same, just the methods they reach there are a bit different. > > And if the common mode will be derived from shell-mode, why not use RET? > > Its current shell-mode's binding doesn't seem useful there. I think that this would have the same problem as 'g': since the buffers are freely-editable text, just trying to type something might result in a surprise re-execution of the command. -- Sean Whitton