Re: Ideal performance of ELisp

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>]

Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> writes:

>>> Yep that's an option, I thought about that as well, not sure how much
>>> practical it is tho.  One of the downside is that we could not consume
>>> nor provide any of the existing C header files.
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that a certain pre-defined set of C headers
>> can still be included?
>
> Where do you undersand that from?  libgccjit does *not* consume nor
> compile C code as input, header files are just that.

An example in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/intro/tutorial01.html
is using functions from stdio.

I did not refer to C code verbatim but rather to whatever is the
function used to translate Elisp "C" macro into libgccjit code. Such
macro may refer to C primitives that are included in the file definition
the libgccjit C wrapper.

-- 
Ihor Radchenko,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at https://orgmode.org/.
Support Org development at https://liberapay.com/org-mode,
or support my work at https://liberapay.com/yantar92