From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 6a2ee981c3: Add new functions for splitting the root window Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 07:19:56 -0700 Message-ID: <875yhre4qb.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <166240424802.11417.12502552895310232639@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220905185728.838CEC0088A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <86h71kseiw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87illzmjew.fsf@gnus.org> <868rmvxdvj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87bkrq5bmb.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmg69ifi.fsf@gmail.com> <87h71i3vr3.fsf@gnus.org> <864jxfghcf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sfkygokp.fsf@gnus.org> <87r10hg5u7.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87sfkve623.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21496"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: Gregory Heytings , Stefan Monnier , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Juri Linkov , Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Hugo Heagren Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 16:22:58 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6oU-0005Jw-1l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:22:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57356 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6oS-0005Ea-UX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:22:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6lj-0003K6-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:58553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oY6lc-0005SB-7v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BF85C0003; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:19:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:19:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1663078798; x=1663165198; bh=a1a6ZD8zb6 VBixKPSjVr3KNMzDgvbpMLAPaTuwQsYGw=; b=R10yxvH+gnH0oc1rMlYZAHe+jt L11GmpwkTBPGvvshC59AaT28iuzGo5sjiOWuhat8YkS62iAtW30nmDIwgVkdYO47 jHHV2LvC3nri4tKJYRgFbFTmestZy7z3NXlrHHRy5yPi8uADFlafG121Ok+2pF4K 1ttkCIrHFSinLjhHkM3Ve2P2PrqoZnwNNbtBy5RlsgVTdpZkgtpjQ8c4J7apP92Y kO6NKykVD3IQhjsYxu8aJ7CPBHMX77CSU14gKtRF4ynFtL1C19bsnK/ac/bS5qsy QhA680kXO66jwv0mFSinjVpcB1/6MMlyMvnukbTb8rRPA5+I0RWNfS0Q70Xw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1663078798; x=1663165198; bh=a1a6ZD8zb6VBixKPSjVr3KNMzDgv bpMLAPaTuwQsYGw=; b=jmA182LtFL2cxWsq0B0NC3cR+OfiryDlgtxdbcK1gdoH /YMR0/1dQZ0n4imc2xva9Jg68dA6MUZ/n+3nz2ceWjy56aLYehwEeqCrny1ijI2Z sEZ68/FSaLiTeft6ArpFTJHUyP8pC2/lgIcFyGwUHCMHQDyaORk/fkHABH+Pyz9K mSGGnNGilvj0SNRawTpCxhbPDtR7KJpTzffqnnnLCQW7aCpnsEsaB0PpaedNWCd7 J6bwh2lX+iUv0533EWSVXmT/RgcRIVxpmCZQQqgrToOpMPQBCriEhHfCdHIaKif9 jndy5Nf6XlHuSX4jCvIMh+Gdy673iXY0FQDznMONIA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrfedugedgjeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttddttddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefuvggrnhcu hghhihhtthhonhcuoehsphifhhhithhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvgeqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffeutedtfedvtdetvefgueefjefggedugfefuddtgeefteek heduvdefjeejieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i23c04076:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:19:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8B5427F14B4; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 07:19:56 -0700 (MST) In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:01:28 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:295251 Archived-At: Hello, On Tue 13 Sep 2022 at 02:01PM GMT, Gregory Heytings wrote: >> >> Seems like one of your goals here is to replace C-x 2, C-x 3 etc. with more >> mnemonic bindings? >> > > I shared a part of my configuration in the hope that it would be > useful. AFAICS, the only commands in that list that are already bound are C-x > 0 1 2 3 +. And C-x { } ^ if you count the subcommands. > >> >> Also, could you say why for the split- commands you use just C-u to split >> the root window, rather than a negative prefix argument as has been >> previously discussed? >> > > That's what I do (and will continue to do) here, but feel free to use a > negative prefix if you prefer. Like Stefan, I never use a prefix argument for > split-window-{right,below}. FWIW, I very much doubt that such an argument is > widely used. Okay, thank you for saying more. I hadn't realised until now, but split-window-{right,below} actually already have a meaning for a negative prefix argument. I don't know how we decide whether to usurp that with having it mean the command should affect the root window. Maybe an experiment requesting feedback, like was done with unbinding M-o? Or maybe it's not important enough for that? What do you think, Lars? My own experience is likewise that I can't imagine ever using a prefix argument with split-window-{right,below}. -- Sean Whitton