From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Type declarations in Elisp Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 21:06:56 +0200 Message-ID: <875y4zq94f.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87il984vxv.fsf@localhost> <03fc79f4-a532-71b1-0de9-8e52bdf3f138@gmail.com> <87msykfwym.fsf@localhost> <83lee3tjla.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmxm7iu2.fsf@dataswamp.org> <878r9wg9l3.fsf@localhost> <87edjo7f4k.fsf@localhost> <87r0noqudo.fsf@localhost> <87pm3732ye.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37274"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:WxV/2BcTYArlT7m/OsneXSPpsRQ= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 29 04:21:32 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qaoMF-0009Q2-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 04:21:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qaoKy-0007aB-Ie; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 22:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qahZt-0000Wh-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qahZr-0004dO-7p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 15:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qahZn-0006lN-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 21:07:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 22:20:11 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309468 Archived-At: Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Elisp bubble: 0.66 sec vs. SBCL 0.66 sec Elisp and CL as are fast! A promising start for Elisp \o/ > Elisp bubble-no-cons: 1.11 sec vs. SBCL 0.81 sec Here however, CL is 37% faster. > Elisp fibn: 1.03 sec vs. SBCL 0.07 sec CL 1371% > Elisp fibn-rec: 3.71 sec vs. SBCL 0.55 sec CL 575% > Elisp fibn-tc: 4.44 sec vs. SBCL 0.41 sec CL 983% Here is the definition of `faster', (defun faster (old new) (format "%d%%" (round (* 100 (1- (/ old new))))) ) https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/math.el -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal