From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: source-directory, installed Emacs, and C source Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:00:16 +0200 Message-ID: <875y2wovsf.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <875y2wrt0q.fsf@catern.com> Reply-To: Manuel Giraud Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="414"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: sbaugh@catern.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 24 18:02:13 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qvJr9-000AP8-QZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:02:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvJpU-000262-3V; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvJpQ-00023U-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvJpM-0003XS-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:00:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=ed25519; bh=7zAfZXds nj5EtfOFc1k5aF0lXCUgD+rPQRu8+cL/gBc=; h=date:references:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=8CfEbZOiH5iV7mjHmwNlU9Mn+7sruT sVMtBfWXl6RlCEUXgLi5pk6pRktNBJ7apMKOBHKZbOpYSApNgibNEwDw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=7zAfZXdsnj5EtfOF c1k5aF0lXCUgD+rPQRu8+cL/gBc=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=Ci/N+u2WLdTHu0F2rNT1ugAHJmkGDDPxglMRqu v0l5bKmQ2UEUDG8ojeqtxxUYSaor51WkLSWW1wxSF4UgvjBLBe347iwTu9zPh82mbAIqHq m8yc9zhZNYZkmM4BuvwrAvcsaoxOYrCjqHv8uVRowT207EMYAIPqV/jxGFMD1NpJ/yP4HL aI/6UHCAzj8vYgtBngeTVjNeIcs54oEHgGRFBw4uxK2G/7bKPo6LUZZGSKFHnFJGZ+vkZp 5ATdbAonW2CMZR+ciGLCXcrjdLLX/Mbek/MV9ZPp6QqTAqWs6M94iHcxKHjToVgpfC+9pj dp2DGm/rS2TmwNMoWxTyoaeA== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1f3262d4 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:00:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <875y2wrt0q.fsf@catern.com> (sbaugh@catern.com's message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:31:49 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.159.28.247; envelope-from=manuel@ledu-giraud.fr; helo=ledu-giraud.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:311806 Archived-At: sbaugh@catern.com writes: [...] > - Jumping to a newer function definition is a problem. > > So we shouldn't be doing it for C. I think it is already the case for =C2=AB=C2=A0normal=C2=A0=C2=BB Emacs use= rs. If you install Emacs for your distribution's package, correct me if I'm wrong, but you won't be able to jump to C definitions. So this option is already done for those users. Now for =C2=AB=C2=A0advanced=C2=A0=C2=BB users (who install from sources), = jumping to newer C function definition might be a problem but being knowledgeable user, he should know that this could be the case. --=20 Manuel Giraud