Re: Questions about proced

Re: Questions about proced

[Rahguzar]

Hi Eli,

> I'm not sure I understand: you do have rss in the attributes, and I
> presume that the amount of physical RAM in the system is well known,
> so why is it a problem?

It is a minor problem but I actually don't understand how proced is
calculating the percentage. If I compare the percentage memory value
from proced with that of top I see that top show a value 4 times that of
proced. Before noticing this I though it was due to proced including
swap but the amount swap is half the amount of ram so I would have
expected the factor to be 1.5. Other programs also show values very
similar to top. The problem is that if I don't remember this fact, I
don't catch the high memory usage.

> > 2) The pcpu construct displays the percentage of cpu used by a process.
> > However it seems like it uses a very long interval to calculate this
> > percentage. So often processes which are basically idle now show up at
> > the top when sorting the processes by pcpu and I can see the cpu used by
> > them decaying slowly. Is it possible to use a shorter interval for pcpu?

> AFAIK, this is calculated by the OS, not by Emacs.

Comparing with top, I notice that value is top changes much more quickly
compared to proced and better reflects the current load. The amount of
total cpu time used by a process is identical between top and proced so
I had assumed that they differed by how the calculated the current load.

Thanks,
Rahguzar

Re: Questions about proced

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Rahguzar <rahguzar@zohomail.eu>
> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 17:33:50 +0200
> 
> Hi Eli,
> 
> > I'm not sure I understand: you do have rss in the attributes, and I
> > presume that the amount of physical RAM in the system is well known,
> > so why is it a problem?
> 
> It is a minor problem but I actually don't understand how proced is
> calculating the percentage. If I compare the percentage memory value
> from proced with that of top I see that top show a value 4 times that of
> proced. Before noticing this I though it was due to proced including
> swap but the amount swap is half the amount of ram so I would have
> expected the factor to be 1.5. Other programs also show values very
> similar to top. The problem is that if I don't remember this fact, I
> don't catch the high memory usage.

You have the sources (in sysdep.c) of what Emacs does, so you can just
look there, and then consult the various system documentation.  AFAIR,
the %Mem column should show the percentage of the physical RAM that
the process's RSS (resident set) takes.  That's what I see on 2
different systems, one MS-Windows, the other GNU/Linux.  On the latter
I compared with 'top', and it shows the same value.  So I don't think
I understand why you see something different.

> > > 2) The pcpu construct displays the percentage of cpu used by a process.
> > > However it seems like it uses a very long interval to calculate this
> > > percentage. So often processes which are basically idle now show up at
> > > the top when sorting the processes by pcpu and I can see the cpu used by
> > > them decaying slowly. Is it possible to use a shorter interval for pcpu?
> 
> > AFAIK, this is calculated by the OS, not by Emacs.
> 
> Comparing with top, I notice that value is top changes much more quickly
> compared to proced and better reflects the current load. The amount of
> total cpu time used by a process is identical between top and proced so
> I had assumed that they differed by how the calculated the current load.

You need to tell more details, like which process you are looking at
in the list (better not be the Emacs process which shows the Proced
display, for obvious reasons), whether you enabled auto-update in
Proced and with what update interval, etc. etc.

Re: Questions about proced

[Rahguzar]

Hi Eli,

> If there are systems there with 16KB pages, and /proc reports RSS for
> them in 16KB pages units and not 4KB page units, then we'd need to
> modify sysdep.c to multiply by the system's page size instead.

> Suggest to report this with all the details as a bug, since here is
> not a good place to discuss this stuff.

I have filed bug#72278 for this.

Thanks,
Rahguzar

Re: Questions about proced

[Rahguzar]

Hi Eli,

[Adding the mailing list again since I accidentally forgot it last
time.]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Rahguzar <rahguzar@zohomail.eu>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:22:25 +0200
>> 
>> > You have the sources (in sysdep.c) of what Emacs does, so you can just
>> > look there, and then consult the various system documentation.  AFAIR,
>> > the %Mem column should show the percentage of the physical RAM that
>> > the process's RSS (resident set) takes.  That's what I see on 2
>> > different systems, one MS-Windows, the other GNU/Linux.  On the latter
>> > I compared with 'top', and it shows the same value.  So I don't think
>> > I understand why you see something different.
>> 
>> Sorry for coming back to this so late. I am using a GNU/Linux but with a
>> kernal that has a 16k page size. I think that might be the problem?
>> 
>> I don't understand C at all but I looked at the sysdep.c as weird math.
>> What stands out is line 3741:
>> 
>> 	  pmem = 4.0 * 100 * rss / procfs_get_total_memory ();
>> 
>> The 4.0 is what makes me suspicious but it is just a hunch without any
>> understanding.
>
> Like I said: the values I see are consistent with 'top', so I think
> whoever wrote that code knew what they were doing.  And note that
> values of 'rss' are multiplied by 4 everywhere they are used.  I think
> the reason is clear: the RSS value is given in units of pages, and
> each page is 4KB, so to convert that into KB units, you must multiply
> by 4.

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough but I wanted to say that one my system the
each page is 16KB and not 4KB so the multiplication should be by 16 and
not 4. This is why for me the value for percentage memory shown by top
is 4 times that show by proced.

Re: Questions about proced

[Rahguzar]

Hi Eli,

[Sending this message again because I accidentally sent it just to Eli.
(Sorry about that)]

> > It is a minor problem but I actually don't understand how proced is
> > calculating the percentage. If I compare the percentage memory value
> > from proced with that of top I see that top show a value 4 times that of
> > proced. Before noticing this I though it was due to proced including
> > swap but the amount swap is half the amount of ram so I would have
> > expected the factor to be 1.5. Other programs also show values very
> > similar to top. The problem is that if I don't remember this fact, I
> > don't catch the high memory usage.

> You have the sources (in sysdep.c) of what Emacs does, so you can just
> look there, and then consult the various system documentation.  AFAIR,
> the %Mem column should show the percentage of the physical RAM that
> the process's RSS (resident set) takes.  That's what I see on 2
> different systems, one MS-Windows, the other GNU/Linux.  On the latter
> I compared with 'top', and it shows the same value.  So I don't think
> I understand why you see something different.

Sorry for coming back to this so late. I am using a GNU/Linux but with a
kernal that has a 16k page size. I think that might be the problem?

I don't understand C at all but I looked at the sysdep.c as weird math.
What stands out is line 3741:

	  pmem = 4.0 * 100 * rss / procfs_get_total_memory ();

The 4.0 is what makes me suspicious but it is just a hunch without any
understanding.

Thanks,
Rahguzar

Re: Questions about proced

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Rahguzar <rahguzar@zohomail.eu>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:26:28 +0200
> 
> > You have the sources (in sysdep.c) of what Emacs does, so you can just
> > look there, and then consult the various system documentation.  AFAIR,
> > the %Mem column should show the percentage of the physical RAM that
> > the process's RSS (resident set) takes.  That's what I see on 2
> > different systems, one MS-Windows, the other GNU/Linux.  On the latter
> > I compared with 'top', and it shows the same value.  So I don't think
> > I understand why you see something different.
> 
> Sorry for coming back to this so late. I am using a GNU/Linux but with a
> kernal that has a 16k page size. I think that might be the problem?
> 
> I don't understand C at all but I looked at the sysdep.c as weird math.
> What stands out is line 3741:
> 
> 	  pmem = 4.0 * 100 * rss / procfs_get_total_memory ();
> 
> The 4.0 is what makes me suspicious but it is just a hunch without any
> understanding.

If there are systems there with 16KB pages, and /proc reports RSS for
them in 16KB pages units and not 4KB page units, then we'd need to
modify sysdep.c to multiply by the system's page size instead.

Suggest to report this with all the details as a bug, since here is
not a good place to discuss this stuff.

Questions about proced

[Rahguzar]

I have a question about proced:

1) The pmem construct in proced corresponds to the percentage of memory used
by a process. However the total memory used for this calculation
includes swap. Is it possible to limit this to just RAM?

2) The pcpu construct displays the percentage of cpu used by a process.
However it seems like it uses a very long interval to calculate this
percentage. So often processes which are basically idle now show up at
the top when sorting the processes by pcpu and I can see the cpu used by
them decaying slowly. Is it possible to use a shorter interval for pcpu?

Thanks,
Rahguzar

Re: Questions about proced

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Rahguzar <rahguzar@zohomail.eu>
> Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:57:09 +0200
> 
> I have a question about proced:
> 
> 1) The pmem construct in proced corresponds to the percentage of memory used
> by a process. However the total memory used for this calculation
> includes swap. Is it possible to limit this to just RAM?

I'm not sure I understand: you do have rss in the attributes, and I
presume that the amount of physical RAM in the system is well known,
so why is it a problem?

> 2) The pcpu construct displays the percentage of cpu used by a process.
> However it seems like it uses a very long interval to calculate this
> percentage. So often processes which are basically idle now show up at
> the top when sorting the processes by pcpu and I can see the cpu used by
> them decaying slowly. Is it possible to use a shorter interval for pcpu?

AFAIK, this is calculated by the OS, not by Emacs.