From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>
Subject: Re: follow-link in grep buffer
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:32:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874qg0gfsn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x54qg0dog0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2005 03:50:39 +0100")
>>> I have added a new option mouse-1-click-in-non-selected-windows
>>> that controls whether mouse-1 click in non-selected windows
>>> will follow links. Default is t.
>>
>> I think it should be purely and simply removed.
>> It addresses the "click to focus window" problem but nobody ever complained
>> about it (contrary to the problem of "click to focus frame" which is still
>> open).
> But that's what the x-mouse-click-focus-ignore-position variable is
> for. And we also have focus-follows-mouse to have Emacs be able to do
> what it takes to give a frame focus.
Then let's use that.
> Anyway, I am complete against automatisms that get things right 70% of
> all the time immediately, with the user being unable to predict the
> behavior 90% of the time, so that he needs to check every time he uses
> the feature what actually happened. If there is a braindead
> consistent rule that gets things right even only 40% of the time, but
> does not require switching on the brain or crosschecking for
> correcting the thing efficiently about 60% of the time, this is
> preferable in my book.
Agreed, which is why x-mouse-click-focus-ignore-position seems like the
right solution: it's very deterministic (doesn't depend on precisely where
you click, for instance) and safe and unsurprising since when it doesn't do
what the user intended, it just did a bit less than what she intended and
she can trivially get what she wants by clicking one more time.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-26 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-21 21:08 follow-link in grep buffer Nick Roberts
2005-02-21 21:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-21 22:48 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-22 0:08 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-22 9:48 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-22 13:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-22 14:24 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-22 14:25 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-22 17:33 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-22 0:48 ` Jason Rumney
2005-02-21 21:45 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-21 22:20 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-21 22:36 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-21 22:46 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-21 23:00 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-21 23:05 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-21 23:42 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-22 0:00 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-21 23:07 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-22 0:44 ` Jason Rumney
2005-02-22 1:26 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-21 23:06 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-21 21:45 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-02-21 21:46 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-21 22:46 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-21 23:22 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-22 18:11 ` Richard Stallman
2005-02-25 6:51 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-25 9:46 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-25 11:12 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-25 12:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-25 13:25 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-02-25 13:40 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-25 14:20 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-02-25 13:37 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-25 14:10 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-26 13:53 ` Reiner Steib
2005-02-27 0:32 ` Richard Stallman
2005-02-25 16:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-25 16:47 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-25 16:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-25 23:05 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-02-25 16:37 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-25 18:09 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-25 19:44 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-25 20:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-25 20:32 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-25 20:53 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-25 20:27 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-25 21:24 ` Robert J. Chassell
2005-02-25 23:34 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-26 0:44 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-26 1:18 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-25 23:35 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-26 2:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-26 2:50 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-26 3:32 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2005-02-26 22:24 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-27 2:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-27 8:26 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-02-27 21:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-27 22:09 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-28 1:03 ` Nick Roberts
2005-02-25 22:53 ` Richard Stallman
2005-02-26 0:16 ` David Kastrup
2005-02-26 22:44 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-02-25 22:52 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874qg0gfsn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.