From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lists.texi Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:28:55 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <874qbqh0lm.fsf@jurta.org> References: <200506182319.j5INJWF08937@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506190015.j5J0FQk09223@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506190037.j5J0b9Y09287@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506191747.j5JHlha11521@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506202312.j5KNCct19091@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506212058.j5LKw5P23961@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119458738 692 80.91.229.2 (22 Jun 2005 16:45:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 22 18:45:28 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl8Ky-0001NN-AN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:44:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl8Rd-00036X-4m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:51:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl8Oh-0001jH-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:48:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl8Oc-0001ga-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dl8OZ-0001Vw-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:48:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dl8Cn-0007lx-Ug; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-32-88-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.32.88]) by Relayhost2.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28361C44; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:32:44 +0300 (EEST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200506212058.j5LKw5P23961@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Tue, 21 Jun 2005 15:58:05 -0500 (CDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39313 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39313 > Apparently these timings are not very fixed. In a freshly started > Emacs, my proposed version took 12 seconds (instead of earlier 23) and > the abstract versions 40 seconds (instead of 51). This gives a > mysterious gain of 11 seconds for both. But now my proposed version > runs 3.33 times faster than the abstract ones, instead of earlier 2.2. I noticed too that in sufficiently long Emacs sessions Lisp evaluation slows down. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/