From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; display property and continuation arrows Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:10:33 +0100 Message-ID: <874pdsrvmu.fsf@escher.local.home> References: <87y7bsez73.fsf@escher.local.home> <87d4sifzwd.fsf@escher.local.home> <477FC0B3.3050009@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199556663 3284 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2008 18:11:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:11:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 05 19:11:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBDUH-0006PD-PE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBDTv-0007ef-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:10:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBDTr-0007dw-LT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:10:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBDTp-0007dh-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:10:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBDTp-0007de-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBDTo-0004VH-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 13:10:44 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JBDTl-0003LV-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:10:41 +0000 Original-Received: from i5387df33.versanet.de ([83.135.223.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:10:41 +0000 Original-Received: from Stephen.Berman by i5387df33.versanet.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:10:41 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: i5387df33.versanet.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86204 Archived-At: On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:38:59 +0100 Jan Djärv wrote: > Richard Stallman skrev: >> This surprises me. I continue to see what I reported with current >> sources, GNU Emacs 23.0.50.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.0) of >> 2008-01-03 on escher. Perhaps the steps I gave to reproduce it were not >> clear. I've made screen shots showing what I see. Here is the buffer >> at step 3 of my OP, before evalling the display sexp: >> >> Maybe it only fails with the GTK build. Jan, can you reproduce the problem? >> > > Yes I cam. On different toolkit builds, so it looks to be tool kit independent. It is definitely toolkit independent, because a similar effect obtains with emacs -Q -nw: when the display property is added with the cursor on the second column of the continued line, the continuation slash at the end of the "first" line remains and there appears to be an empty line (cf. the second image of my previous post); but the display property is added with the cursor on the first column of the continued line, the continuation slash at the end of the "first" line vanishes and there is no "empty" line (cf. the fourth image of my previous post). Steve Berman