Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org> writes:

> On the other hand, if we see something like:
>
> | ttn <-> git <------------> git <-> jrhacker   : high freq
> |        emacs              emacs               : changes
> |          ^                  ^
> |          |                  |
> |          v                  v
> |         bzr <------------> bzr                : low freq
> |        emacs              emacs               : changes
>
> evolve, then maybe that's not so bad.

I, for one, will be using git instead of bzr to make initial changes to
Emacs.  Once tested, my changes will then be imported from git to bzr by
means of some script, much like my current setup for the git emacs repo
at git.sv.gnu.org and CVS HEAD.

Once I learned that git branches were simply pointers into a DAG, and
once I experienced the absurdly good speed of git, there was simply no
going back to bzr and Mercurial.

-- 
|       Michael Olson  |  FSF Associate Member #652     |
| http://mwolson.org/  |  Hobbies: Lisp, HCoop          |
| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
`-------------------------------------------------------'