From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rmail-mbox branch Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:06:42 -0400 Message-ID: <874p7bvzq5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87zlprvod0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4868CF84.1040005@pajato.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214831265 17974 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2008 13:07:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Michael Reilly Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 30 15:08:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDJ7D-00071z-I5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:08:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDJ6L-0005iG-N2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:07:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDJ5l-0005NJ-0V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:06:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KDJ5h-0005LR-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:06:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49279 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KDJ5h-0005LO-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from c-24-63-201-57.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.63.201.57]:10880 helo=furry) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KDJ5g-0006Eq-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 21A73C056; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:06:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4868CF84.1040005@pajato.com> (Paul Michael Reilly's message of "Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:20:20 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100218 Archived-At: Paul Michael Reilly writes: > I've bitten the bullet and started to work on it again. As I said in > private email to Chong, working on this project in a CVS branch has all > the appeal of trying to convince most of the readers of this list that > vi was the right way after all. Sure enough, I check out the branch, > do a ./configure run "make bootstrap" and BAM: Most unfortunate. But shouldn't the relevant file be only rmail.el? Maybe you could pull in the rest of the CVS trunk keep the version of rmail.el from the branch. Or does the mbox branch change other files? Anyway, thanks for doing this.