From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Dzhus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Commiting gdb-mi.el changes to Emacs upstream Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:42:03 +0400 Message-ID: <874otra2l0.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246787063 15619 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2009 09:44:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 09:44:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 05 11:44:16 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MNOGc-0006AV-V3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:44:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNOGc-0008T8-Aa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:44:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNOFx-0007sg-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNOFq-0007eV-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:43:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50399 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNOFq-0007dn-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:43:26 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:47290 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MNOFq-0006q3-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:43:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MNOFm-00028H-7q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:43:22 +0000 Original-Received: from 95-24-74-12.broadband.corbina.ru ([95.24.74.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:43:22 +0000 Original-Received: from dima by 95-24-74-12.broadband.corbina.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:43:22 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 95-24-74-12.broadband.corbina.ru User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zg2Yf+AwFixvdRJj52PJg08fMfU= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112036 Archived-At: I'm now ready to push some of the changes I made to gdb-mi.el to Emacs trunk. I personally use hg and now I'm thinking what's the best way to put all the changes in Emacs CVS. I did more than 60 commits to my repo since it was last «synced» (that was done by Nick for me) with Emacs CVS. On one hand, I don't want to upload all changes in one huge CVS commit because it will be painful to track changes introduced: gdb-mi.el | 1426 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- On the other hand, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to spam Emacs CVS with 60 commits. Should I split the big patch into several (not dozens) more or less self-contained patches? Please tell me what's the preferred way to do it. If 60 commits are ok i'll write a script which will push my mercurial commits to emacs cvs commits (as long as it's possible). This way granularity I have in my local repo will be preserved in Emacs upstream as well. -- Happy Hacking. http://sphinx.net.ru む