From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Switching to bzr: what Emacs developers should know? Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:24:29 +0800 Message-ID: <874osi6zpe.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249748695 2499 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2009 16:24:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 16:24:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 08 18:24:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MZoir-0001MB-RD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 18:24:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZoir-0006gf-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZoil-0006ga-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:24:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZoih-0006gE-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:24:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34931 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZoih-0006gA-Nt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:24:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.249]:61266) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZoih-0008Ho-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 12:24:35 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so849669rvb.6 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:24:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:user-agent :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=plxuy2HM+Y15UNv28SATDZmrZoglx/n1I/UtqalYeZY=; b=cotgUwGwvIurvUQr+01K6hgoBoJhWdODm3gAoq+mOo1wnOilHRJQlFxOnjxFtDsQ0M L7oM+GASt2gPrtcgUm5Pr2zGz+S3ZpihenVF2vHWiWxjyKUBuJKMXrWHH7hL4Fc9DI1z 3NtdkQy8PRni2hR0zZ/GRfaPmwwAtST5RewAE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; b=bKLeVchzlUn6LL3GrZeCssxxJd/W+zrWMCO17xf1TMgAwrLvjOHahHM435EdBNF00K dokD3G/xXz0SBk9uxwcKYWU5Ob1qPNt9Zn/TcOh3WKO42lCPlMFGdGCEZ4M5eAONwiPa KrmtkqqD+A3jg3Yo7DNYKc8XAxKqE4KehUGKM= Original-Received: by 10.140.225.15 with SMTP id x15mr903353rvg.89.1249748674379; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx (p4158-ipbf4110marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [123.224.221.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20sm13490860rvf.21.2009.08.08.09.24.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:24:33 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113803 Archived-At: Can someone describe the bzr workflow for Emacs developers? Will the switch to bzr affect the way upstream packages like Gnus or Org are integrated in Emacs development? Would there be any advantage of switching to bzr for these packages? -- Bastien