From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:45:07 -0500 Message-ID: <874op07kb0.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87zli4jcc4.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87vdsrjcco.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87d4eerm8w.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4yy7qba.fsf@yahoo.com> <87vdiiof1d.fsf@canonical.com> <87d44ceg5s.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bpjwe46n.fsf@red-bean.com> <87zl6vskq0.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257979537 26520 80.91.229.12 (11 Nov 2009 22:45:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, jearl@notengoamigos.org, Ian Clatworthy , Daniel Clemente To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 11 23:45:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8LwK-0005GV-8G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:45:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42957 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8LwJ-00054y-Cg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8LwE-000547-8I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:45:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8Lw8-0004sh-Qw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:45:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57402 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8Lw8-0004se-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:56246) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8Lw8-0001uy-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39260 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N8Lw4-0000xR-BZ; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:45:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:56:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116849 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Karl Fogel writes: >> But, Andreas, how was your "emacs.bzr" made? > With bzr fastimport, the latest one available. Thanks. So, let's sort this out: we currently have three conversions we could test :-). That's potentially a lot of extra work. It would be best if we focused on one. The three I know of are: 1) http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs-merges.tar.gz # Jason's conversion done with the trunk version of bzr fastimport # (also known as "Ian Clatworthy's version") 2) http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs-merges-jason.tar.gz # Converted with Jason's modified version of trunk bzr fastimport. # He says this conversion has the missing tags that we've discussed # before, and has the missing emacs-unicode branch (although it # appears to be called "emacs-unicode.remote"). 3) "I've put something on fencepost in ~schwab/emacs.bzr" # Andreas Schwab's conversion, but I think one needs login access # to fencepost to get it? It doesn't seem to be web-accessible; # Andreas, is there a URL to reach it by? Anyway, my guess is that (2) is the right thing to test. I'm CC'ing Ian Clatworthy who will have a more informed opinion (he's a Bazaar developer, but I think he's also familiar with Jason's changes). -Karl