From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: zwz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: might a bug in ido-mode Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:21:29 +0800 Message-ID: <874oixgvau.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sk6jpu49.fsf@gmail.com> <83mxwrzeha.fsf@gnu.org> <87iq7eh2sj.fsf@gmail.com> <83fx2iyvml.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272356551 22343 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2010 08:22:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:22:31 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 27 10:22:30 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6g3o-0001wp-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:22:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37251 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6g3l-0007bh-EH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:22:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6g3e-0007ao-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34142 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6g3a-0007Yc-Tj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6g3M-0000mG-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:22:14 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6g3L-0000ll-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:22:00 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6g3K-0001q1-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:21:58 +0200 Original-Received: from 61.164.42.188 ([61.164.42.188]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:21:58 +0200 Original-Received: from zhangweize by 61.164.42.188 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:21:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Lines: 84 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.164.42.188 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:diM4awZ6jpk0O0ksGsILJnVl9BE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124239 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Instead of typing "c", type "bt" and show the results. Please do that >> in all of the 4 threads you have, like this: >> >> (gdb) thread 1 >> (gdb) bt >> (gdb) thread 2 >> (gdb) bt >> >> etc. > > or > > (gdb) thread apply all bt > > Andreas. Ok. Here is the output: Thread 3 (thread 4136.0xa80): #0 0x77cf5e74 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource () from C:\windows\system32\ntddl.dll #1 0x77cf5610 in ntdll!ZwWaitForMultipleObjects32 () from C:\windows\system32\ntddl.dll #2 0x7672a5d7 in WaitForMultipleObjectsEx () from C:\windows\system32\kernel32.dll #3 0x00000002 in ?? () #4 0x21dafef0 in ?? () #5 0x7672a6f0 in WaitForMultipleObjects () from C:\windows\system32\kernel32.dll #6 0x6e2d1883 in msiltcfg!ShutdownMsi () from C:\windows\system32\msiltcfg.dll #7 0x00000002 in ?? () #8 0x21daff78 in ?? () #9 0x7672d0e9 in KERNEL32!AcquireSRWLockExclusive () from C:\windows\system32\kernel32.dll #10 0x77cd19bb in ntdll!RtlInitializeNtUserPfn () from C:\windows\system32\ntddl.dll #11 0x77cd198e in ntdll!RtlInitializeNtUserPfn () from C:\windows\system32\ntddl.dll #12 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 2 (thread 4136.0x1148): #0 0x77cf5e74 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource () from C:\windows\system32\ntddl.dll #1 0x76aed67f in setjmp () from C:\windows\system32\msvcrt.dll #2 0x0082ffc4 in ?? () Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) Thread 1 (thread 4136.0xea8): #0 0x77cf5e74 in ntdll!LdrAccessResource () from C:\windows\system32\ntddl.dll #1 0x764a6fd1 in USER32!SetMenuContextHelpId () from C:\windows\system32\user32.dll #2 0x0116e2fe in set_frame_menubar () #3 0x010178ef in update_menu_bar () #4 0x0102ad6a in prepare_menu_bars () #5 0x0102ed02 in redisplay_internal () #6 0x01061d66 in read_char () #7 0x01063334 in read_key_sequence.clone.0 () #8 0x01065bd0 in command_loop_1 () #9 0x0100a592 in internal_condition_case () #10 0x0105bebf in command_loop_2 () #11 0x0100a4dc in internal_catch () #12 0x0105c848 in command_loop () #13 0x0105c8d3 in recursive_edit_1 () #14 0x0104c8ce in Frecursive_edit () #15 0x01002d86 in main () I am using gdb 7.1. p.s. Is there anyway to print the backtract to a file? I want to give another description of how I catch the bug. After C-x C-f, and input a file name, usually the ido-mode will try to search in other directories if such a file exists, and says in the minibuffer "searching for blabal ...". Now it is the very timing to hit C-j or backspace. I find it is easier to catch the bug by backspace. Anyway, I have to try many times in different directories with various file names (which should be found by ido-mode in another directory other than the current one) to catch the bug. Hope this helps.