From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6076: 23.1.96; [PATCH] rcirc-complete for nicks and commands Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 19:54:14 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <874oiequd2.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87vdb3y7bv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87zl0fctpt.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87ljbu36ed.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273600450 24139 80.91.229.12 (11 May 2010 17:54:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 17:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6076@debbugs.gnu.org, Leo To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 11 19:54:07 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBteb-0007Tv-BW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:54:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40316 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OBtea-0007tp-U1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54306 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OBteS-0007po-8Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:53:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBteQ-0000DW-Qc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 13:53:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBskt-0004mW-To for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 12:56:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBsjW-0002xk-98; Tue, 11 May 2010 12:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6076 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 6076-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6076.127359686911380 (code B ref 6076); Tue, 11 May 2010 16:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6076) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2010 16:54:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBsiz-0002xU-8B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 12:54:29 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out2.starman.ee ([85.253.0.4] helo=mx2.starman.ee) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBsiw-0002xP-Mi for 6076@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 12:54:27 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx2.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.68.105.cable.starman.ee [82.131.68.105]) by mx2.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96C53F40EF; Tue, 11 May 2010 19:54:17 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 10 May 2010 21:14:10 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:55:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:36878 Archived-At: > Yes, completion-in-region already places a field, so that's indeed part > of the plan, but I'd like it to be slightly more lightweight than what > you suggest: RET should not be required to leave completion. Then maybe leave completion when the property `point-left' calls its hook when leaving the field? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/