From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: full production use of org-mode: time to say thanks again! Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 16:37:26 +0100 Message-ID: <874ocsagg9.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <87r5fzk5j5.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <20EA118D-E909-47F4-AEF8-8B1B929F5601@gmail.com> <87eibzfgia.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <87bp720vwy.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <871v7xz182.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <664F7423-EE5E-40E8-B6B3-CE2EEB4E08BC@gmail.com> Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Multipart_Mon_Oct_11_16:37:26_2010-1" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40517 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5N39-0004ln-Kf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:24:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5N2g-0002SS-PT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:24:17 -0400 Received: from vscane-b.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.141]:63792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5N2g-0002Rw-LZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:24:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <664F7423-EE5E-40E8-B6B3-CE2EEB4E08BC@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode mailing list , Nicolas Goaziou --Multipart_Mon_Oct_11_16:37:26_2010-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:04:15 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > Hi, > > On Oct 11, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Could you try the following patch and tell me if it fixes your issue? > > A quick test shows that things seem to work well in inlinetasks which > are properly ended with an END line. > > There is also a dirty form of inline tasks which allows > only a planning line (SCHEDULED etc) and one or several > drawers directly after the task line, and then no > END line is necessary. But I guess it is fair > to force the END line if you do want to have > proper indentation. That requirement would seem to make sense. > Eric Fraga, have you tested the patch yet? Please do > so when you wake up from your two-week sleep, so that > we can check this in. I have tested it and it seems to work fine. I've not seen anything major break but I haven't done a thorough test. > I am seeing now two things that should be added: > > - M-RET after inline tasks should ignore the inline task > and make a new entry with normal indentation Yes, that would be nice especially as it takes quite a few TABs to get back to a proper level and sometimes I cannot tell what that level should have been... Actually, it might be nice if the TAB immediately after a M-RET would go back to the next previously used level in the hierarchy? Although this might be tricky... > - Maybe I should treat inline tasks with proper END > statement as a drawer and fold it? Comments? Could be useful but it's not critical for me: I don't tend to put too much text between the start and end of inline tasks so it's not too intrusive. Thanks to both you and Nicolas, eric --Multipart_Mon_Oct_11_16:37:26_2010-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII -- Eric S Fraga GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29 570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D --Multipart_Mon_Oct_11_16:37:26_2010-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --Multipart_Mon_Oct_11_16:37:26_2010-1--