From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Avoiding replies on emacs-diffs Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:22:17 -0400 Message-ID: <874obwg25i.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87eib2iz0p.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <878w1ao559.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4ktiwwc.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288909368 30735 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2010 22:22:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 04 23:22:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PE8Ch-0003cj-FN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 23:22:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50435 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PE8Cf-0001qq-1i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:22:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38215 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PE8CT-0001od-Jo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PE8CS-0000wd-7k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from osh-net-219-98.onshore.net ([66.146.219.98]:35790 helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PE8CS-0000wK-5F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48426 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PE8CJ-0008Qm-Cp; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:22:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:51:46 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132377 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> The fallback is to just prohibit posting from anyone but the commit 'bot. > >That's actually not a fallback, but just a good idea in general. Agreed -- whichever way we go with Reply-to, there's no reason to have devel discussions on emacs-diffs@. If human mails to the diffs list bounce, then people will be motivated to send to emacs-devel@ instead, with whatever UI gestures that may entail.