From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7785: rgrep is broken on woe32 Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:29:06 +0100 Message-ID: <874o9nx9vx.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87d3oc17oo.fsf@telefonica.net> <87k4ijxeh2.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294268051 26065 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2011 22:54:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , 7785@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sam Steingold Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 05 23:54:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PacF4-0007sH-67 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:54:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56280 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PacF3-0005F0-GQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:54:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39738 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PacEu-0005DO-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:53:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PacEs-00089F-Uu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:53:56 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PacEs-00089B-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pabkz-0005ci-Vm; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7785 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7785-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7785.129426613121557 (code B ref 7785); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 22:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7785) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2011 22:22:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PabkB-0005be-3X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:22:11 -0500 Original-Received: from impaqm5.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.21] helo=telefonica.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pabk7-0005bQ-N4 for 7785@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:22:09 -0500 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost2.adm.correo ([10.20.102.39]) by IMPaqm5.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id ryKH1f00J0r0BT63RyV9Zd; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:29:09 +0100 Original-Received: from qcore ([88.24.214.212]) by IMPmailhost2.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id ryV71f0064bXV5U1iyV7Eh; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:29:08 +0100 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-original-sender: 981711563@telefonica.net In-Reply-To: (Sam Steingold's message of "Wed, 5 Jan 2011 16:20:13 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:23:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43127 Archived-At: Sam Steingold writes: >> Maybe you are mixing Cygwin's find with gnuwin32 grep ? >> > > no, I am not. > here is the same error with the full paths: [snip] Maybe it is related to this: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6784