From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How does the Emacs bug tracker work? Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:28:09 +0200 Message-ID: <874o34e8bq.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87zkkzfiz5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8762nnujk8.fsf@gmx.de> <87r56953jk.fsf@gmx.de> <87boxced1c.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309638517 21443 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2011 20:28:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 22:28:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd6nn-0007TH-FC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:28:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51197 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd6nm-0000Zh-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53959) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd6nZ-0000Za-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd6nV-0000v8-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:57382) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd6nV-0000v2-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Jul 2011 20:28:11 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB8C08.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.140.8] by mail.gmx.net (mp064) with SMTP; 02 Jul 2011 22:28:11 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/vqJEMNgfv6OBMFUXlc9TmwWHPPjXCq1F+HtByFD cYD98Nee/OkjOl In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:19:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/1.2.3 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141463 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> I've changed that default value. It's hard coded now; if needed we could >> make it a defcustom. > > I think 500 is way too low. Fetching 500 bugs (via Emacs) takes about > the same time as displaying one reload of the debbugs web page. > > And I suspect that will be accessed 1000x more often than the Emacs > interface (by web bots :-), so the limit from the Emacs interface should > be at least 2K. I have no serious meaning about. Let's Glenn observe it for a while, and maybe we could tune. The Lars-bot works interactively, and he is prompted for another value :-) Best regards, Michael.