From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:46:02 +0900 Message-ID: <874nv4yngl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <4F2EAF8E.3010106@alice.it> <83d39tcjdx.fsf@gnu.org> <87haz4zksa.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fweozgbu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d39szb88.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87aa4wz9of.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328543196 19830 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 15:46:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Angelo Graziosi , "Richard M. Stallman" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 16:46:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQls-0006eC-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:46:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42095 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQlr-0002YS-FM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:46:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51305) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQll-0002YH-N6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:46:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQlf-00030v-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:46:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:44293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuQlZ-000301-N5; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15FB97063E; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 00:46:02 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C6F11A282A; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 00:46:02 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" e6b5c49f9e13 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148266 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > > Let me clarify that as Paul and others point out, you are in violation > > of the letter of the GPL, which requires actual source, not a pointer, > > but that's not what I meant. > > I do not understand what that would mean. Is not all you can give just > a pointer? (Whether it is in the form of a http URL or a DOI URI does > not really matter, or?) If you're providing an archive, of course you can include the source in that archive. If you don't include source in the archive with the binary, I interpret clause 6(d) to mean that if the GnuTLS binary is available at http://www.gnu.org/projects/emacs/w32/contrib/gnutls-999.zip the GnuTLS source can be at http://www.gnu.org/projects/emacs/w32/contrib/gnutls-999-src.zip or similar. No explicit URI needed. :-) Or you can provide a README-GnuTLS-source.txt or similar at http://www.gnu.org/projects/emacs/w32/contrib/README-GnuTLS-source.txt that gives an arbitrary URL. See my other post for why clauses 6(a), 6(b), 6(c), and 6(e) don't apply here.