From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thorsten Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Guile based Elisp faster? (was Re: Kickstarter for Emacs) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:17:11 +0200 Message-ID: <874nsasp14.fsf@googlemail.com> References: <87wr5dfm9v.fsf@gnu.org> <87398118ys.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335178220 10538 80.91.229.3 (23 Apr 2012 10:50:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:50:20 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 23 12:50:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGqZ-0007jV-By for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:50:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40251 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGqY-0001W9-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:50:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGqO-0001St-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:50:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGqM-0005uR-Rt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGqM-0005r0-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMGqK-0007cs-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:50:04 +0200 Original-Received: from e178057128.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.57.128]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:50:04 +0200 Original-Received: from quintfall by e178057128.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:50:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e178057128.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:A+SYB6KASW9sUyp6B1hniiQ34Es= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149953 Archived-At: Phil Hagelberg writes: > Maybe I should just wait for Guile to gain the capability to > run Elisp, since that would be another way to achieve this goal. Will Elisp become faster when Guile runs it? Yesterday I did a little speed comparision between my two favorite Lisps (Elisp and PicoLisp) and Elisp did not perform that good (even when compiled). See http://picolisp.com/5000/!wiki?PILvsEL. -- cheers, Thorsten