From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Teemu Likonen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10779: 24.0.93; ERC: Patch to make server response timestamp format customizable Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:49:07 +0300 Message-ID: <874ns2pe58.fsf@mithlond.arda> References: <87pqdmzsmk.fsf@mithlond.arda> <87r4vsfibi.fsf@mithlond.arda> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335725398 13653 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2012 18:49:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10779@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 29 20:49:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZC0-0003eo-Pl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 20:49:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZC0-0000kp-78 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:49:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53361) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZBx-0000kk-Im for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZBv-0006Nx-VU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:49:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.43] (port=57001 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZBv-0006LD-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:49:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZD4-000630-EV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Teemu Likonen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10779 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 10779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10779.133572542823200 (code B ref 10779); Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2012 18:50:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZCW-000629-Bv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:45564 helo=kirsi1.inet.fi) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZCU-000621-2v for 10779@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:50:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mithlond.arda (84.251.132.215) by kirsi1.inet.fi (8.5.140.02) id 4F9D79B000009A3C; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:49:07 +0300 Original-Received: from dtw by mithlond.arda with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SOZBD-0001Y6-5E; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:49:07 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87r4vsfibi.fsf@mithlond.arda> (Teemu Likonen's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:59:13 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59631 Archived-At: * Teemu Likonen [2012-04-13 05:59:13 +0300] wrote: > * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen [2012-04-12 22:20:15 +0200] wrote: >> Looks good to me. Do you have FSF copyright assignment papers on >> file, or if not, would you be willing to sign such papers? > > No, I don't have but would like to. How do I proceed? The papers have been signed now, so I guess you are free to apply my patch.