From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11565: delayed init variables don't get documentation properties Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:29 -0400 Message-ID: <874nr09j5y.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338234831 13894 80.91.229.3 (28 May 2012 19:53:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 19:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11565@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 28 21:53:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ60i-00071j-Az for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 21:53:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ60i-0000Mz-1G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ60e-0000Mr-Q3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ60d-0005gK-5S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ60d-0005gF-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ61t-0007Un-LU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 19:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11565 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11565-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11565.133823489128797 (code B ref 11565); Mon, 28 May 2012 19:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11565) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2012 19:54:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47051 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ61j-0007UQ-Dt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:57187 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ61h-0007UJ-PK for 11565@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:54:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZ60P-0000Mn-ON; Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:29 -0400 X-Spook: BRLO Arnett Attorney General SAFE Exon Shell Syria Freeh X-Ran: cU*W1ruku7ql^#:q?ZQIDN1!+"zT'IW?c?,w'ja>#h.WtU=Cl7KHUh}$F},hVM2tSw;QT( X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 27 May 2012 09:00:03 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60434 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I guess either we undo 3), or change 2) so that it sets the variable to >> nil. The latter seems ok to me ...? > > Undoing the var-part of 3 sounds fine to me. There's a downside to doing that, in that bug#11036 will be reopened. What's the downside to making custom-initialize-delay temporarily bind variables to nil? Another option: Snarf-documentation to check if variables are bound, or members of custom-delayed-init-variables.